Skip to main content

24 AUG 2026

Tingvar vs SynthBoard

Both argue that one assistant agreeing with you is the problem. SynthBoard argues it in writing, at length, and publishes real sessions. Tingvar argues it out loud and publishes the measurement instead.

Where they are ahead of us

SynthBoard publishes seventeen dated shared sessions, view counted, with the models named, read from www.synthboard.ai shared sessions index on 23 August 2026. That is more published evidence of its own behaviour than anything else in the crawled set, and we have published none, because zero real human sessions have taken place. If you want to read what one of these products actually produced before you pay for it, they can show you and we cannot.

The content surface is theirs as well. Around 331 pages, counted from www.synthboard.ai sitemap and a full crawl of it on 23 August 2026, against a register of 68 public routes here. A seventy two term glossary, read from www.synthboard.ai glossary index on 23 August 2026. Ours defines a term only where speech changes its meaning, so a reader looking for a vocabulary to read through has one there and not here. They own the anti-sycophancy search term outright, with a landing page and four posts behind it, and this page concedes the term rather than arguing about who should hold it. We will not match that content surface at launch. Their citation page for assistants was better than ours before we wrote ours.

They also ship a thing we have only planned. An agent protocol server available on every tier including the free one, read from www.synthboard.ai/mcp on 23 August 2026. Ours is on the roadmap and not in the product, so a team that wants to drive one of these from the tools it already runs can do that with them today and cannot do it with us at all.

The axis this comparison turns on

We concede the term. Arguing about who owns the word for a problem is not a use of anyone's afternoon, and they own it.

What is left is the mechanism. SynthBoard's product is text. Their single voice claim is one row in a feature comparison, available on the two most expensive tiers, with no page describing it, no sample, no demonstration and no published session in which it was used. Ours is a live room where one persona holds the floor, the room decides who, and your voice takes the floor from whoever has it.

And we publish numbers about it. Six metrics that would say whether the room does its job are defined on our evidence page with published targets and no measured values, because there is nothing to measure yet. That is a weaker claim today than an argument written well, and a much stronger one the moment it has a value in it. See what we have measured

Row by row

Tingvar and SynthBoard on facts each publishes about itself, read on 23 August 2026. Our own gaps are in the same column style as theirs.
TingvarSynthBoard
Modality Live audio room Text. All seventeen published sessions render as written cards
Voice The whole product. Four persona voice samples are published today One feature row on a comparison table, on the two most expensive tiers, with no page, no sample and no published behaviour
Published sessions None. Zero real human sessions have taken place Seventeen, real, dated and view counted, with the models named
What separates the agents What each optimises for, plus a published blind spot for each Expert roles, described by domain
Published blind spots Yes, one per persona, on /personas Not published
Anti-sycophancy measurement Six metrics defined, six targets published, no measured values Not published. The argument is made in prose across a landing page and four posts
Published latency figure Median 1471 ms, 95th percentile 1986 ms, from 122 readings in us-central1 on 19 August 2026 Not published
Site size 68 public routes in the register, and this site names the ones not written yet Around 331 pages
Glossary Six terms, only where speech changes the meaning Seventy two terms
Machine readable page copies Sixteen, and each one resolves Published across the site, and forty of them return 404
Pricing without JavaScript Server rendered text Their pricing page returns 200 and ships a loading placeholder to a client with scripting off
Tier badges One tier carries a badge Three of four tiers carry a superlative badge, which distinguishes none of them
Agent protocol available to your own tools Planned, not shipped Shipped, and available on every tier including the free one

When to use each

Reach for SynthBoard

  • You want to read a real session before you buy anything.
  • You want a written record with a recommendation at the end of it.
  • You want to drive it from the tools you already run.
  • You would rather read than listen.

Reach for Tingvar

  • You want to hear the disagreement rather than read a summary of it.
  • You want to interrupt the moment something is wrong.
  • You want the mechanism published as numbers, including the empty ones.

Questions about this comparison

What is Tingvar bad at?

Tingvar is bad at anything you want agreement or output from: it will not draft your deck, write your code, or summarise your meeting. It is a poor fit for casual brainstorming, for a decision you have already made, and for anyone who wants their instinct confirmed. It has no published customer outcomes, because zero real human sessions have taken place. The evidence page carries what we have measured and what we have not, including the rows that are empty.

How we compare

Every claim about another product on this site is a fact that product publishes about itself, read from its own pages on the date below. Where a product publishes nothing on a point, the cell reads not published, because an absent published fact is not an absent capability. Our own weaknesses are in the same table, in the same column style.

Compared on 23 August 2026

Sources

Every claim about SynthBoard on this page, with its source and the date it was read
Claim Read on their own pages at Read on
Text, with all seventeen published sessions rendering as written cards www.synthboard.ai shared sessions index and the session pages themselves 23 August 2026
Voice as one feature comparison row, gated to the two most expensive tiers, with no marketing page, screenshot, demonstration or published session The feature comparison data in the shipped www.synthboard.ai bundle 23 August 2026
Around 331 pages www.synthboard.ai sitemap and a full crawl of it 23 August 2026
A seventy two term glossary www.synthboard.ai glossary index 23 August 2026
Forty machine readable page copies returning 404 Direct requests to each advertised twin on www.synthboard.ai 23 August 2026
The pricing page returning 200 and shipping a loading placeholder with scripting off www.synthboard.ai/pricing, fetched with scripting disabled 23 August 2026
Three of four tiers carrying a superlative badge The tier definitions in the shipped www.synthboard.ai bundle 23 August 2026
An agent protocol server available on every tier including the free one www.synthboard.ai/mcp 23 August 2026

Right of reply

If you work at one of these companies and something here is wrong, email corrections@tingvar.com. We correct it within 1 business day and log the correction publicly.

corrections@tingvar.com

Correction log

No correction has been requested or issued. This log is dated and it stays here whether or not it has entries.

Listen to four voices first

The voice samples on the persona page are real. The words in them are scripted, and the page says so. Hear the four voices